Who won the world cup 2010
Who Won The World Cup 2010? If you missed the greatest soccer game ever, that is, the finals of the FIFA World Cup between Netherlands vs Spain, then you must be wondering who won the World Cup 2010. If you managed to watch it live online or on TV, then you obviously know.
For all those who missed the FIFA World Cup 2010 Netherlands Vs Spain match, the winner is Spain. The final score was Netherlands 0 and Spain 1.
You can get the details of the FIFA World Cup Netherlands vs Spain match here. The goal for Spain was scored by Andres Iniesta.
Showing posts with label world cup 2010. Show all posts
Showing posts with label world cup 2010. Show all posts
Sunday, July 11, 2010
spain wins world cup
Spain Wins World Cup 2010: In Pictures
spain wins world cup
Congratulations to Spain on winning the 2010 World Cup after beating Netherlands 1-0 in extra time after a goal by Andres Iniesta.
Here are photographs from this historic day in World Cup history where Spain has won the World Cup for their first time and where they are current holders on both the World Cup and European Championship.
More pictures after the jump:
See Also :
Irish Terrier Dog Breed Description, History, Grooming, Health Issues And Living Conditions
or
Robert “Bobby” Spillane (PHOTO) Falls to Death
or
the World Cup Final 2010
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
World Cup
Can South Africa afford the World Cup?
I think hosting the World Cup in South Africa may be too large a burden for a smallish developing country: population 49 million, with per capita income $10,000. With $6 billion invested in infrastructure, security, etc, the tab would come to about $122 per capita, which is not outrageously high, but is more than a trivial sum. This is also a substantial sum relative to public revenues of about $75 billion. Unlike Greece, however, South Africa’s finances are in good shape, with public debt at about 36% of GDP in 2009. The World Cup won’t help matters on this score, but thus bulge in public investment won’t break the bank.
The shoes of Uruguay national team are seen on a line before a practice session in Kimberley, South Africa on June 7. South Africa is the first African nation to host the World Cup. The tournament will likely have both negative and positive economic impacts on the country.
The positive side of the World Cup in South Africa is that it heralds an ongoing transformation in the country. It is perhaps capable of countering the view “that Africa is a place of disease, despair, death and destruction, no matter how much progress gets made on the political front,” as Michigan State’s Peter Alegi puts it. This story in USAToday, ”For South Africa, the World Cup is finally a time to shine” looks at both the positives and the negatives for the country. There are plenty of both.
As for the chances of our national team, I rate our chances of progressing past the group stage at about 50-50. England is a powerhouse, and Slovenia will provide a tough test. The US will likely need to beat at least win one of those rivals to have a chance going into the final match vs. Algeria, although two draws would work if England beat Slovenia.
Why is the United States a second-rate soccer power? Patrick Rishe discusses the economic factors in his column at Forbes.com. If he’s right, an upset against England might put some fuel in the American soccer engine. Meanwhile, folks in Boston are salivating over the prospect of hosting World Cup games in 2018 or 2022, for which the USA is planning to bid. I hope they get the chance, even if the economic impact numbers are inflated. Meanwhile, the opening game of the 2010 World Cup is just four days away, and England vs. USA is Saturday. Come on USA! Beat England!!
As for the chances of our national team, I rate our chances of progressing past the group stage at about 50-50. England is a powerhouse, and Slovenia will provide a tough test. The US will likely need to beat at least win one of those rivals to have a chance going into the final match vs. Algeria, although two draws would work if England beat Slovenia.
Why is the United States a second-rate soccer power? Patrick Rishe discusses the economic factors in his column at Forbes.com. If he’s right, an upset against England might put some fuel in the American soccer engine. Meanwhile, folks in Boston are salivating over the prospect of hosting World Cup games in 2018 or 2022, for which the USA is planning to bid. I hope they get the chance, even if the economic impact numbers are inflated. Meanwhile, the opening game of the 2010 World Cup is just four days away, and England vs. USA is Saturday. Come on USA! Beat England!!
World Cup
Can South Africa afford the World Cup?
I think hosting the World Cup in South Africa may be too large a burden for a smallish developing country: population 49 million, with per capita income $10,000. With $6 billion invested in infrastructure, security, etc, the tab would come to about $122 per capita, which is not outrageously high, but is more than a trivial sum. This is also a substantial sum relative to public revenues of about $75 billion. Unlike Greece, however, South Africa’s finances are in good shape, with public debt at about 36% of GDP in 2009. The World Cup won’t help matters on this score, but thus bulge in public investment won’t break the bank.
The shoes of Uruguay national team are seen on a line before a practice session in Kimberley, South Africa on June 7. South Africa is the first African nation to host the World Cup. The tournament will likely have both negative and positive economic impacts on the country.
The positive side of the World Cup in South Africa is that it heralds an ongoing transformation in the country. It is perhaps capable of countering the view “that Africa is a place of disease, despair, death and destruction, no matter how much progress gets made on the political front,” as Michigan State’s Peter Alegi puts it. This story in USAToday, ”For South Africa, the World Cup is finally a time to shine” looks at both the positives and the negatives for the country. There are plenty of both.
As for the chances of our national team, I rate our chances of progressing past the group stage at about 50-50. England is a powerhouse, and Slovenia will provide a tough test. The US will likely need to beat at least win one of those rivals to have a chance going into the final match vs. Algeria, although two draws would work if England beat Slovenia.
Why is the United States a second-rate soccer power? Patrick Rishe discusses the economic factors in his column at Forbes.com. If he’s right, an upset against England might put some fuel in the American soccer engine. Meanwhile, folks in Boston are salivating over the prospect of hosting World Cup games in 2018 or 2022, for which the USA is planning to bid. I hope they get the chance, even if the economic impact numbers are inflated. Meanwhile, the opening game of the 2010 World Cup is just four days away, and England vs. USA is Saturday. Come on USA! Beat England!!
As for the chances of our national team, I rate our chances of progressing past the group stage at about 50-50. England is a powerhouse, and Slovenia will provide a tough test. The US will likely need to beat at least win one of those rivals to have a chance going into the final match vs. Algeria, although two draws would work if England beat Slovenia.
Why is the United States a second-rate soccer power? Patrick Rishe discusses the economic factors in his column at Forbes.com. If he’s right, an upset against England might put some fuel in the American soccer engine. Meanwhile, folks in Boston are salivating over the prospect of hosting World Cup games in 2018 or 2022, for which the USA is planning to bid. I hope they get the chance, even if the economic impact numbers are inflated. Meanwhile, the opening game of the 2010 World Cup is just four days away, and England vs. USA is Saturday. Come on USA! Beat England!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)